Intuition
A ferromagnet’s magnetization behaves like a gyroscope: when you push it with a magnetic field, it doesn’t simply align with the field — it precesses around it, just as a spinning top precesses around gravity. Real magnets also lose energy (to the lattice, to electrons, to spin waves), so the precession slowly spirals inward until comes to rest along the effective field. And in modern spintronic devices, an electrical current carrying angular momentum can give the magnet an extra “kick” — a spin-transfer torque — which can sustain oscillations or even switch the magnetization. The Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert (LLG) equation, in its full Slonczewski form, packages all three effects into a single equation of motion for the unit vector .
Formal Definition
The full equation of motion, including spin-transfer torque, is the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert–Slonczewski (LLGS) equation:
with
- the unit magnetization vector (),
- the effective field (sum of exchange, anisotropy, demagnetizing, and Zeeman contributions),
- where is the gyromagnetic ratio — the constant relating angular momentum and magnetic moment,
- the dimensionless Gilbert damping coefficient,
- the Slonczewski spin-transfer torque.
The constraint is built in: each torque term lies in the plane perpendicular to , so only the direction of changes, never its magnitude.
Key Results
1. Pure precession — the Landau–Lifshitz (LL) equation
In the absence of damping and external torques:
This drives the Larmor precession of around . The minus sign reflects the negative gyromagnetic ratio of the electron: precession is clockwise when viewed along . Energy is conserved — the cone angle never closes.
2. Adding dissipation — the Gilbert torque
Real magnets dissipate energy through spin–lattice and spin–electron couplings. Gilbert added a viscous torque
which is perpendicular to and points inward in the precessional plane. Inserting it gives the LLG equation:
The cone angle now closes monotonically: spirals toward . Typical values of range from (YIG) to (Co, Fe alloys).
3. Explicit form
The LLG equation is implicit in . Taking the cross product with on the left and using yields the mathematically equivalent explicit Landau–Lifshitz form:
This is the form used by most micromagnetic solvers (e.g. MuMax3, OOMMF).
4. Spin-transfer torque — the LLGS equation
In MTJs and spin-valve nanopillars, a spin-polarized current transfers angular momentum to the local magnetization. The Slonczewski torque has the canonical form
where is the unit polarization vector (set by a reference layer), and , encode the damping-like and field-like components, both proportional to the current density . The damping-like term competes directly with : above a critical current it can sustain auto-oscillations (as in STVOs) or switch the free-layer magnetization (the basis of STT-MRAM).
Summary
| Term | Name | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Precessional (LL) | Larmor precession around | |
| Gilbert damping | Drives alignment with | |
| Spin-transfer torque | Current-induced torque (MTJs, spin valves) |
Connections
- effective-field — what enters and how it’s computed
- larmor-precession — the precessional motion driven by the LL term
- spin-transfer-torque — origin and structure of
- spin-polarized-current — how the polarization arises
- magnetic-tunnel-junction — the device in which LLGS is most often applied
- thiele-equation — collective-coordinate reduction for rigid textures (vortex core)
References
- L. Landau & E. Lifshitz, Phys. Z. Sowjet. 8, 153 (1935).
- T. L. Gilbert, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 3443 (2004) — phenomenological damping.
- J. C. Slonczewski, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, L1 (1996) — spin-transfer torque.
- W. F. Brown Jr., Micromagnetics (Interscience, 1963).